
Go to main menu / top of page

Introduction
Most
survivors of serious felonies find the crime deeply traumatizing. A stunning
number of these citizens are further victimized by “official” incompetence,
wrongdoing, and misconduct. This internet site assists victims where
authorities failed to properly investigate and/or prosecute a crime against them
or a loved one, as well as people who have suffered overt abuse from legal
officials.
If
you are a victim of:
√
a homicide officially labeled as suicide or accident,
√ a serious felony ignored by law enforcement,
√ refusal by officials to admit or correct errors
in failing to properly investigate a crime against you or a loved one,
√ law enforcement dismissal or burying of
pertinent information related to a crime,
√ your efforts to secure justice answered by
indifference, insults, and slander from officials,
√ police threats and lawless acts to silence you,
√ false accusation of wrongdoing by law
enforcement,
√ police use of unprovoked violence or excessive
force,
√ judicial bias and/or error,
√ illegal search and seizure,
√ arrest on false charge,
√ vilification by colleagues and superiors for
speaking out about misconduct within your criminal justice agency,
√ your formal complaint citing law enforcement
misconduct unjustly denied by the offending agency,
You may find the following helpful:
Grief and Survivor Support
Justice
Agency Injustices

Go to main menu / top of page

It Can Happen to You
People
are invariably shocked and damaged at becoming a victim of the justice system.
Most individuals
who
contact
us became victims because they did the “right thing.” Are you
someone who would:
• Call 911 for help with a crisis
• Ask for law enforcement assistance if you or a
loved one were a crime victim
• Provide information to authorities which might
help solve a crime
• Report misconduct within the criminal justice
system agency where you work
If so, you put yourself in jeopardy of becoming a criminal
justice victim.

Go to main menu / top of page

How our Organization
Promotes Justice
In addition to helping individual victims, we focus on
supporting the implementation of policies to strengthen our criminal justice
systems and further our country’s ideals of equal justice for all.
Our Executive Board members, each a crime victim survivor, became re-victimized
by officials after asking them to uphold and administer justice.
(Read the details in the section titled
Our Executive Board.)
Law-abiding citizens, we each believed fully in American justice, and were
deeply saddened to find our far-reaching regard for the system and those
employed in it to be naïve.
We do
not know the percentage of trustworthy, conscientious officials versus those who
are neither. We do realize there is serious need for reforms in our country’s
police, prosecutorial, and judicial systems. This view is shared by respected
organizations which provide law enforcement training in integrity, ethics, and
accountability.[1] We believe that the great
majority of employees will respond positively to state-of-the-art policies and
training which teach and reward accountability, ethics, and integrity. We
support the rapid implementation of these strategies (see our
Strategies that Prevent
Officer Misconduct section). As victims without justice, we manage
our grief and loss by working for reform within our systems (to reduce the
numbers of citizens being victimized) and by helping traumatized survivors. We
are eager to cooperate with all who wish to improve our justice agencies. Please
contact
us so we can develop ways to work together on these issues.

Go to main menu / top of page

Abuse by Criminal
Justice Officials
There
are virtually no societal controls on criminal justice officials. With no
obligation to act regarding crime, officials can and do ignore serious
felonies.[2] The
victim who assertively attempts to get authorities to perform may become a
target for officer insults, slander, a search and seizure
of the individual or their property (the warrant gained through false testimony to a
judge), and the manufacturing of evidence or false testimony to intimidate or
prosecute the person regarding a crime he/she never committed, false arrests,
and other forms of direct and indirect retaliation.
Unprovoked violence by police in public places and even in citizens’ homes is
also on the rise. Law enforcement officers arrest these victims on charges
invented to justify the police violence.[3]
No
American should assume himself immune from becoming a victim of official
incompetence, misconduct, or abuse.[3]
√ Criminal justice training and policies are
inadequate, especially in the areas of accountability, integrity, ethics,[1]
and victim and community relations.
√ Hiring standards in most law enforcement
agencies have been lowered the past two decades.[1]
√ Citizen complaints against officers are usually
“investigated” by the same agency against whom the complaint is made and are
routinely denied or glossed over.[2]
√ The few citizen review boards which exist
typically lack subpoena or disciplinary powers necessary to make a difference.[2]
√ The Blue Code of Silence is prevalent.[1]
Officials cover up for each others’ negligence and misconduct, and offending
persons go unchecked as employees do not wish to communicate about the
wrongdoing of others.[1] [5]
√ If an official selects to “blow the whistle” on
someone in his team, it is virtually certain that he/she will be ostracized by
colleagues,[1] and often harassed, gagged, and
forced to resign.
√ A “good ole’ boy” mentality exists among
district attorneys, grand jury members, city councils, and judges (backing up
law enforcement even when officers egregiously break the law).[2]
√ Laws give district attorneys almost complete
immunity for their wrongdoing.[2]
√ Most attorneys, aware of the far-reaching “good
ole’ boy” network which protects police from liability for their wrongs, will
not represent innocent citizens whose rights have been violated.
√ Law enforcement wrongdoing is “hushed up”;
citizens learn only about those occasional cases which obtain public attention,
and public officials treat reports of wrongdoing as an “aberration."[4]
√ A significant minority of “law and
order”citizens defend acts of police misconduct and brutality no matter how
unprovoked.[3]
√ If a citizen defends himself from a police
officer’s attack, the officer can (and likely will) charge him with a felony
count of “assaulting a police officer.” The officer can also shoot his victim
(and almost always get by with it by claiming he feared for his life).[3]
√ Citizens are afraid to intervene against law
enforcement misconduct or brutality.[3]
√ If a police officer is found liable in civil
court for violating a citizen’s rights, the damages are usually paid by the
county or by insurance, not by the offending officer.
√ Police forces have become militarized,
contributing to an “us against them” attitude by officers toward the public.[3]
√ Bullies are often attracted to police work (in
studies it’s been found that police officers perpetrate at least double the rate
of family violence than does the population at large).[2]
√ Law enforcement officials investigated for
rapes, domestic violence, and child abuse are rarely prosecuted and usually
continue in their jobs of “public protectors.”[2]
Power Tends to Corrupt, Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely
----Lord Acton, British Historian, 1887
Even though our country and all democratic societies
survive within the truth of Lord Acton’s words, criminal justice officials in
the U.S. enjoy nearly complete unchecked power. Society’s failure to answer
the question of who polices the police, or to even ask the question in regard to
district attorneys, guarantees abuse against citizens and a failure of equal
justice for all.
Law enforcement departments go to great lengths to make
the public believe that internal affairs properly punishes officer wrongdoing.
These agencies create a camouflage of rhetoric, policies, programs, and
committees that convince the public that such problems are assertively monitored
and corrected while they hide their on-going, systematic acts of injustice.[2]

Go to main menu / top of page

Who Helps Victims of the
Justice System?
These survivors frequently carry their heartbreaks and
emotional scars alone. Friends and family, in order to feel secure, may not
wish to hear how officials acted wrongly or face the reality that the same could
happen to them.
The needs of these victims are often inadequately met in
survivors’ groups, where the crimes endured by most members are being addressed
by authorities. Group members (seeking to please the investigator and district
attorney handling their case) may be afraid to stick up for survivors who’ve
been mistreated by officials. Crime victims re-victimized by justice system
officials are among those most isolated, broken, and damaged—often enduring an
on-going sense of helplessness, fear, and grief.
Do Government-Funded Advocate Centers Assist
these Victims?
Criminal justice officials have gained ever-increasing
control over Victim Witness Centers, leaving advocates unable to confront
wrongdoing by law enforcement. Advocate centers’ core funding is usually
administered by a state criminal justice office, and grants most often require
that victim centers obtain approval from local law enforcement chiefs.
Advocates have their offices in the police department or district attorney’s
office with whom their agency is contracted. Stripped of their power to stand
up to officials on a victim’s behalf, they become one more disappointment to the
survivor who thinks surely there’s someone who advocates in behalf of law
enforcement victims.

Go to main menu / top of page

Strategies
that Prevent Officer Misconduct
Research
has identified the origins and solutions to officer wrongdoing.[1]
Yet, no national, standardized movement exists to effectively implement
state-of-the-art policies and training to prevent corruption. We acknowledge
the National Institute of Ethics, which has delineated most of the strategies we
list below. Dr. Neal Trautman, Director of the Institute, previously a
decorated police officer, holds Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees in Criminal
Justice and a Ph.D. in the Administration of Criminal Justice. We offer the
following list to show how problems of criminal justice victimization of
American citizens can/will be stopped. When communities and law enforcement
agencies incorporate policies and practices such as the following, most officer
misconduct will be eliminated, police/community relations will be improved;
increased convictions of those guilty of serious felonies will occur; law
enforcement morale will be improved, and wrongful prosecutions will decrease:
√ Upper administration insures quality
recruitment and thorough background investigations (including making certain
those who conduct background checks have completed a background investigation
seminar, have sufficient resources, and are told by the chief that he/she will
be held accountable for the quality of their investigations).[1]
√ Administrators and decision-makers receive
training in corruption prevention solutions and in implementing the cutting edge
in field training.[1]
√ Administrators show courage in determining,
acknowledging, and correcting the flaws of the current discipline system, e.g.,
making sure rules and regulations are fair, clear, realistic, well-communicated,
and that employees understand the consequences of violating policies.[1]
√ The chief administrator role-models total
commitment to integrity, openly holding him/herself accountable to determine
ethical problems and to implement policies to resolve them.[1]
√ Agencies conduct effective career survival
training focusing on: causes of misconduct, ethical dilemma situation training,
researched facts about bad cops, intervention to prevent fellow officers from
destroying their career through misconduct, the need for ethical courage, the
abilities required to rise above the toughest moments,[1]
and police/community/victim relationship training. Top administrators attend
this training to educate themselves as well as to emphasize its importance to
employees.[1]
√ Agencies establish a mindset where officers
hold themselves and their fellow workers accountable for their actions, where
loyalty to principles such as honor and integrity are truly embraced as the
highest priority.[1]
√ Administrators establish and perpetuate a
culture that constantly analyzes to whom or where the loyalties of workers are
committed. Moral heroism is taught as the highest of values.[1]
√ The organization has a written policy
protecting whistleblowers.[1]
√ The agency has a written policy that mandates
termination for anyone who does not report misconduct to a supervisor and
Internal Affairs. Supervisors must review the policy with subordinates and
speak to them directly about integrity and the code of silence.[1]
√ Agencies implement an effective process that
tracks performance and levels of integrity (through use of force reports,
citizen complaints, allegations within civil suits, letters and phone calls from
the public, internal commendations and confirmed violations of policies, etc.,
so there is intervention for those whose performance is outstanding, required
self-training programs for employees needing assistance to correct performance
deficiencies, and appropriate firings and discipline. Mid-level supervisors
report results to administrators at quarterly “Integrity Meetings.”[1]
√ All employees sign an Oath of Honor stating,
“Honor, integrity, ethical behavior, and respect shall never be betrayed. I
will always hold myself and others accountable for acting in accordance with
these values.”[1]
√ Visible signs of integrity reinforcement, such
as posters, pictures, and quotes are placed in locations throughout the agency.
√ The chief administrator conducts annual
confidential surveys to ascertain the level and source of anger or frustration
that employees feel within their agency. Once determined, corrective actions
are taken until future surveys confirm that employees feel policies are fair and
that discipline is consistent, progressive, and appropriate.[1]
√ Chief administrator demands ethical, respectful
role-modeling of all leaders and makes sure these leaders have the skills to
show respect, appreciation, and fairness to employees; and to give attention and
help to subordinates’ personal needs.[1]
√ Supervisors are trained to and required to act
as trainer, counselor, ethical role model, and mentor for their employees.[1]
√ Supervisors are reviewed and evaluated in part
by how they deal with officers who violate citizens’ rights and engage in
unethical behavior.[4]
√ The agency punishes officers who violate
administrative rules.[4]
√ State and federal prosecutors prosecute
criminal acts committed by officers, including superior officers complicit in
those acts.[4]
√ All authorities ensure that the conduct of
police officers meets international standards that prohibit human rights
violations.[4]
√ Law enforcement officials answer to independent
review boards which have subpoena and discipline powers.[2]
fn
1.
www.ethicsinstitute.com
fn
2.
www.justicewomen.com/handbook/part1_obstacles.html
fn
3.
www.counterpunch.com/roberts09252007.html
www.hrw.org/reports98/police/uspo14.htm

Go to main menu / top of page

Would “Law Enforcement Accountability” Result in a Crime Wave?
The National Institute of Ethics, a Congressional award
winning nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to furthering ethics and
integrity throughout America, states that the cover-up of misconduct hurts law
enforcement. Dozens of the most capable and qualified law enforcement leaders
in the nation came together in 2001 to form the National Commission on Law
Enforcement Integrity to orchestrate a nationwide, coordinated movement to
implement and sustain strategies and techniques to prevent employee misconduct
and enhance the integrity of law enforcement agencies. Unfortunately, this
Commission was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina. We encourage all concerned with
strengthening our justice systems to support groups working toward law
enforcement reform. Please read our
Strategies that Prevent
Officer Misconduct section.

Go to main menu / top of page

Justice Agency Injustices
National
Institute of Ethics (nation’s largest provider of law enforcement and
corrections ethics training)
www.ethicsinstitute.com
Police
Watch U.S. Civilian Review Board (public can file a personnel complaint with
them regarding any law enforcement official in U.S.; they will assign an agent
to investigate and act)
http://policewatch.us/system/index.php
National
Police Accountability Project by the National Lawyers Guild (dedicated to ending
police abuse of authority through legal action, education, and support of
grassroots and victims’ organizations)
http://www.nlg-npap.org/index.htm
Women’s
Justice Center (advocacy for victims of rape, domestic violence, and child
abuse; their chapters titled “Mapping the Obstacles to Criminal Justice for
Women” at
www.justicewomen.com/handbook/part1_obstacles.html and “How to Write an
Effective Letter to Make the System Work for You” at
www.justicewomen.com/handbook/part3_write.html are especially helpful
Police
Complaint Center (they document and investigate alleged incidents of police
misconduct)
www.policeabuse.org/
Police
Misconduct and Your Rights (guidelines to know and exercise your legal rights
when confronted by a police officer)
http://hyperreal.org/misconduct
Innocence Project (national litigation and public policy organization dedicated
to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and reforming the
criminal justice system to prevent further injustice),
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
September 25, 2007 article by Paul Craig Roberts (Asst. Sec of Treasury in
Reagan administration, past Assoc. Editor of Wall Street Journal editorial page
and Contributing Editor of National Review) titled “A Pandemic of Police
Brutality - And They Usually Get Away With It”
http://www.counterpunch.com/roberts09252007.html
Twisted
Badge (promotes public awareness of law enforcement malfeasance)
www.twistedbadge.com
Police
Crimes (news on police officers, police departments, and other law enforcement
agencies)
www.policecrimes.com
DMOZ
Open Directory Project/Police Misconduct (articles and site links related to
police misconduct)
http://www.dmoz.org/Society/Issues/Crime_and_Justice/Police_Misconduct/
Americans
for Effective Law Enforcement (a non-profit organization which publishes legal
information, conducts seminars for law enforcement officials and their attorneys
as to what police can and cannot lawfully do in the performance of their law
enforcement functions, and presents positions regarding criminal justice issues
of national importance)
http://www.aele.org/
policeattorney.com (a private law office focusing on
administrative/disciplinary, civil and criminal defense of peace officers
related to acts and omissions in the course and scope of duty—covers peace
officers’ rights, the purpose of Internal Affairs investigations, legal
requirements in handling citizen complaints, etc.)
http://www.policeattorney.com/internal-affairs.htm
Police
Complaint Database (records reporting of serious misconduct of police and law
enforcement officers)
www.policecomplaint.com
Police
Misconduct (information on police misconduct with related links)
http://michaelbluejay.com/police
Race,
Racism, and the Law (information on justice and race issues)
http://academic.udayton.edu/race/03justice/crime.htm
Mishpat.Net Internet Legal Information, Police Misconduct (information on police
misconduct and related site links)
http://mishpat.net/law/Criminal_law/law_enforcement/police/Police_Misconduct/index.shtml
Article
by David McGowan, March 4, 2002, titled “American Heroes?”
www.davesweb.cnchost.com/wtc14.html
Real
Crimes – Real Cases (families of murder victims from across the Country
summarize their cases of police cover-up and corruption)
www.realcrimes.com/
Addressing Police Misconduct, U.S. Dept. of Justice (laws enforced by the U.S.
Department of Justice) “Addressing Police Misconduct,”
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/cor/Pubs/polmis.htm
Human
Rights Watch (the largest human rights organization based in the U.S., conducts
fact-finding investigations into human rights abuses around the world, publishes
findings, meets with government officials to urge changes in policy and
practices at the UN, the European Union, and in capitals around the world),
“Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United
States
http://www.hrw.org/reports98/police/uspo14.htm
Department of Justice Office of Victims’ Rights Ombudsman, “The Rights
Established Under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004,”
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/vr/cvra/index.html
Government Liability Legal Info Center (the law as it relates to issues of
government liability—includes articles, frequently asked questions, important
court decisions, and resources)
http://www.governmentliability.com/law.html
California Department of Justice, “Policy Governing Citizen Complaints Against
Law Enforcement” (guidelines governing the manner in which the DOJ will respond
to complaints by members of the public against a law enforcement agency or its
employees)
http://ag.ca.gov/civilrights/pdf/citizencomplaintpolicy.pdf
California Department of Justice Unlawful Discrimination Handbook, Chapter 9 –
“Peace Officer Misconduct or Abuse,” (the Attorney General may bring a civil
action to eliminate the unlawful pattern or practice of a government agency or
person engaging in a pattern of practice that deprives any person of rights,
privileges, or immunities secured or protected by state or federal law),
http://ag.ca.gov/publications/civilrights/01CRhandbook/chapter9.php?PHPSESSID=0a7e5488329f785908ee1d2b47cf616
California Department of Justice (a general guide to help you direct your
inquiries and complaints about government)
http://ag.ca.gov/consumers/general/government.php
California Department of Justice (a copy of the actual Complaint Form required
to file a complaint against a law enforcement officer or agency with
California’s Attorney General)
http://ag.ca.gov/consumers/pdf/complaint_form_law_enforcement.pdf
California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice: created by the
California Senate to examine causes of wrongful conviction and to make
recommendations and proposals to insure the administration of justice is just,
fair, and accurate.
www.ccfaj.org (taking public comment).

Go to main menu / top of page

Grief and Survivor Support
Resources
National
Organization of Parents of Murdered Children (on-going emotional support,
education, prevention, advocacy, and awareness to all survivors of homicide
victims)
http://www.pomc.com/
National
Coalition of Homicide Survivors (information, resources and ideas, to improve
support and victim assistance services to homicide survivors),
www.mivictims.org/nchs/resource/states/ca.html
DMOZ
Open Directory Project/Society:Crime:Victims (articles and links relevant to
crime victims),
www.dmoz.org/Society/Crime/Victims
Safe Horizon (efforts to
prevent violence, provide support and promote justice for victims of crime and
abuse and their families,
www.safehorizon.org
Citizens Against Homicide
(assists families through the criminal justice system, accompanies victims to
parole hearings to keep the convicted murderer in prison, provides information
on crime legislation),
http://www.murdervictims.com/CAH.htm
Murder (links to articles
on survivor issues)
http://home.earthlink.net/~hopefull/TC_murder.htm
Families & Friends of
Murder Victims (a California non-profit organization providing information,
support, and friendship to survivors of murder victims),
www.webersons.com/ffmv
Crime Victims United
(education and political action to enhance public safety, promote effective
crime-reduction measures and strengthen the rights of crime
victims)
www.crimevictimsunited.com
National Organization for
Victim Assistance (victim and witness assistance practitioners, criminal justice
agencies and professionals, mental health professionals, researchers, victims
and survivors promoting rights and services for crime victims),
www.trynova.org/
Families & Friends of
Violent Crime Victims (Washington based organization providing support and
advocacy for all victims of crime, missing persons, and their loved one, and
providing education about victims' rights and services),
www.fnfvcv.org/
Crime Survivors (advocacy
and resources for crime victims and their families to help victims become
survivors),
www.crimesurvivors.com
The Compassionate Friends
(national support organization helping grieving parents, grandparents, and
siblings)
www.compassionatefriends.org
Homicidal Drownings (many
drownings are actually homicides, provides guidance to first responders
regarding investigation),
http://www.firerescue1.com/fire-ems/articles/310457/
Justice for Homicide Victims (support
and friendship to survivors of homicide, information about the criminal justice
system, information to interested professionals regarding the problems faced by
the survivors of a violent death),
www.justiceforhomicidevictims.com
MADD (information
on victim rights and the legal system, online chats and special resources to
help you cope with grief, injury, medical, and financial issues that often
follow a drunk-driving crash),
http://www.madd.org/Victim-Services.aspx
Beyond
Missing (aid in the recovery of abducted and
missing children by providing high speed, cost effective communication tools to
law enforcement and the communities they serve, parent information and
resources),
http://www.beyondmissing.com/about_bm.shtml
Survivors Network of Those Abused by
Priests, (nation's largest, oldest and most active support group for women and
men wounded by religious authority figures--priests, ministers, bishops,
deacons, nuns, brothers, monks, and others; independent with no connections to
church or church officials),
http://www.snapnetwork.org/

Go to main menu / top of page

Examples of Frequently Asked
Questions
1. My daughter’s death was
called an accident but I believe he/she was murdered. What should I do?
Answer: Talking to
someone who’s been in your shoes can reassure and strengthen you to pursue the
truth. Go to our
Contact Us section and phone us. Every
person’s situation is unique. It’s best we give specific guidance regarding
what to document and how to approach officials. We have learned useful tips
from ours and others’ experiences.
2. Officials don’t seem to
want to investigate a crime committed against me. When I talk to them, they
make me feel as if I’m bothering them and they’re condescending. What can I do?
Answer: Don’t let rude
remarks or unsympathetic responses from officials dissuade you from your pursuit
of justice. We can best guide you with more information, helping you form ways
to deal effectively, but not aggressively, with officials. They need to see you
as determined and strong, but not belligerent. We can also help you clarify if
you need to file a Formal Complaint against an official or officials and how to
do that. Go to our
Contact Us section and phone us—let’s talk.
3. My rights have been
violated by a police officer. How do I find an attorney to help me?
Answer: Few attorneys
are equipped to deal with police misconduct cases. If you speak to an attorney
who doesn’t specialize in this area, you will most likely be discouraged. Don’t
be influenced by an attorney who isn’t an expert in such cases. We have a
civil rights attorney on our Advisory Board who will attempt to help you locate
a qualified attorney in your area. Go to our
Contact
Us section and phone us. You also need the support of people who’ve
walked in your shoes. We can provide support, and you will find similar cases
at our “Justice Agency Injustices” links.
4. I want to file a Formal
Complaint against a policeman but I’m afraid he or his colleagues will take
revenge against me. How can I prevent this from happening?
Answer: It is best that your
Formal Complaint be filed with the assistance of a civil rights attorney.
Officials are much less likely to mistreat you if they know you have skilled
legal protection. Do not let “just any attorney” handle this matter.
We can attempt to help you find an appropriate attorney in your area. If
you cannot afford the services of an attorney, one of our Executive Board
members can help you with the Complaint and also put you in touch with one of
the centers under our “Justice Agency Injustices” list which assist with
Complaint filings. It is important that the agency against whom you are
complaining realize that other knowledgeable people are helping you and know of
your circumstances. Send copies of the Formal Complaint to your mayor,
city council members, and other community members.
5. I called 911 for help
with a family problem and one of the officers who went to the house shot my son,
then claimed he killed him in self-defense, saying he feared for his life. No
weapon was taken into custody and those who were present said my son had no
weapon. Isn’t this murder or at least involuntary manslaughter? How can the
policeman get by with this? I’m devastated.
Answer: We assume that
none of the other officers at the scene disagreed with the one who claimed he
acted in self-defense, or perhaps they even agreed with him. Unfortunately,
this happens too often. It’s called the Blue Code of Silence—a practice among
law enforcement in which officers cover up for each others’ acts of excessive
force and wrongdoing. You need the support of others who’ve experienced a
similar situation. Go to our
Contact Us section and phone us. You also need
a good attorney who specializes in Wrongful Death Suits (usually, this type of
attorney takes the case on contingency and little or no up-front money from you
is required) as well as a civil rights attorney to help you file a Citizen
Complaint against the officer(s) and assist you in seeking criminal charges or a
rightful consequence for the guilty official(s). Read our website sections,
Abuse by Criminal Justice
Officials and
Justice Agency Injustices
where you will find many aids. Join with other parents who’ve lost loved ones
to murder. There are many helpful links under our
Grief and Survivor Support
section.
6. I keep getting stopped
by police while driving and have been wrongly ticketed. I think it’s because I
filed a Complaint against an officer who was belligerent and rude to me. How
can I stop this?
Answer: We will attempt
to help you find an attorney in your area who is adept at representing citizens
against police (most attorneys aren’t willing to act against police, let alone
act competently). Go to our
Contact Us section and phone us. We can
provide important emotional support, plus advice about how to behave if you’re
stopped again by an officer. If you lack the money to hire an attorney, we can
provide guidance with a Citizen Complaint and refer you to centers that help
with Complaints against police. It is important that the agency against whom
you’re complaining know you have legal help and/or assistance from others.
7. My seventy-one year old
mother was shot three times in the chest while drinking coffee on her front
porch. Authorities called her death a suicide and closed the case. I am in
disbelief, how could this happen? I’m getting nowhere with the police and can’t
afford an attorney or private investigator.
Answer: Victim survivors
who simply phone the agency or meet with officials are rarely successful in
getting them to re-open a case. Officials may “shine you on” indefinitely.
Request copies of the Police Investigative Notes and Coroner’s Report to find if
the “three shots in the chest” are mentioned. FAX or mail us a copy of the
reports. We can then help you decide on your next step, which may be to file a
Formal Complaint with the responsible agency(s). We have forms we can FAX or
e-mail you to help you prepare the Complaint, and we will be available by phone
to assist. Agencies are required by law to investigate and respond in writing
to a Formal Complaint. If officials fail to act responsibly regarding your
Complaint, you have evidence of their wrongdoing, which allows you to go to a
higher authority. You need the support of a murder victim survivors’ group. Go
to
Contact Us and give us a call. Read our section
Abuse by Criminal Justice
Officials. There is an abundance of helpful information at the links listed
in our Justice Agency Injustices and
Grief and Survivor Support
Resources sections.
8. When I was seventeen I
was arrested and charged with crimes I didn’t commit. I served nearly three
years of a seventeen-year sentence before the real facts came out and a judge
set me free. I want to change the laws that made it easy for me to be wrongly
convicted. I haven’t received even an apology, let alone compensation for the
damage done to me. Will you help me get laws changed?
Answer: We are eager to
cooperate with every group and individual who is working to improve our criminal
justice system. Go to our
Contact Us section and let us know exactly what
you’re doing and how we can help. If there’s a way to support you in being
compensated for your damages, we want to do that, too.
9. I’ve been accused of a
crime I didn’t commit. The D.A.’s Office has no evidence but they’re pursuing
this anyhow. It’s costing me a fortune to defend myself, and I’m very scared.
Can you help?
Answer: Phone us so we
can provide you emotional support (go to our
Contact
Us section).
We can give you some beneficial ideas
and suggestions. We can provide even better assistance by reading the paperwork
on your case. After talking with us on the phone, you will know whether you
wish to copy these legal documents and mail them to us for further help.
10. Why would you believe a
citizen is innocent if a police officer says he committed a crime?
Answer: We are crime victims
who assist people victimized by criminals and by incompetent and unethical
officials. We listen with the ears of experience. We study documents
related to the case. We consult with our private investigators (former
police officers) and the attorney on our Advisory Board. Each advisor has
extensive experience in dealing with criminals and police. Our judgments
are based on evidence and experience. Everyone must prove his integrity to
us, including police.

Go to main menu / top of page

Wings of Justice
Executive Board
We
share our stories as crime survivors/justice system victims to let others in
similar circumstances know they are not alone and to provide personal testimony
regarding our own experiences. Many citizens victimized by our justice systems
have become fearful of authority and reluctant to speak about the wrongs they
endured. We hope, in giving voice to their pain, to help them re-build their
strength.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mary B.
Stewart, Founder, Chairperson
Wings
of Justice
Mary Stewart, a Marriage, Family Therapist, for years provided counseling to
individuals, couples, and families in southern California. On the morning
of June 10, 1992, Mary found her daughter dead from a gunshot wound to the
forehead. In shock and grief, she called 911. Riverside County
Sheriff officers arrived, quickly labeling the death a suicide.
In the
period following Terese’s death, friends and family became aware of information
suggesting Terese to be a homicide victim. As Mary and her son, Shane, provided
evidence to local authorities, they found themselves repeatedly traumatized by
officers’ indifference and rudeness. Mary hired private investigators, and
sheriff officials victimized Terese’s family by blithely dismissing findings.
Nine years after Terese’s death,
Mary’s attorney contacted the California State Attorney General’s Office
regarding the homicide case compiled by Mary’s investigators—the suspect, a man
who with his wife had been convicted of fraud against Mary concurrent with
Terese’s death. The Attorney General referred Terese’s investigation back to
Riverside. Riverside District Attorney Investigator Martin Silva interviewed
Mary. To her astonishment, Silva claimed that either Terese committed suicide
or Mary killed her. In response to Silva’s acts, Mary’s attorney warned her
if she didn’t give up her quest for justice for Terese, Riverside officials
would try to destroy her, perhaps even fabricate evidence to falsely prosecute
her.
When Mary refused to give up her
justice efforts, Silva presented a fraudulent affidavit to a local judge (which
included thirty-one material misstatements and omissions) in order to get a
search warrant against Mary’s home. Silva and four additional officers, under
the color of law, vandalized Mary’s home. Mary filed a Formal Citizen Complaint
with Riverside District Attorney’s Office regarding Silva’s affidavit perjury.
Chief Investigator Michael Curfman falsely claimed he could not substantiate
Silva’s perjury. Mary complained to the agency chief, District Attorney Grover
Trask, who took no action, making himself complicit in the cover-up of Silva’s
criminal behavior. A trying year passed with Silva and District Attorney
Michael Soccio refusing to review the private investigative package with Mary or
her representatives. Mary again asked the California State Attorney General’s
Office to take charge of Terese’s case.
After more diligent efforts by Mary,
Riverside District Attorney’s Office and the State Attorney General’s Office
acknowledged Terese’s death to be a homicide. Two years later the two top
officials in the State Attorney General’s Office Criminal Division reviewed the
evidence. Agreeing Riverside mishandled the case, they claimed they lacked the
resources to act in behalf of Terese, and took no action regarding Silva’s
perjury. The Blue Code of Silence had now moved from the county level to the
state level (state officials should have filed criminal charges against Silva
regarding his affidavit perjury).
In response to a federal civil rights
lawsuit Mary filed against Silva, District Magistrate Stephen Larson agreed to
allow Mary to take Silva to jury trial to seek to hold him accountable for
committing perjury in the Search Warrant Affidavit and for perpetrating a Search
and Seizure against Mary in order to harass and intimidate her. One month
later, in a written ruling, Larson reneged on his decision. Stating that he was
bothered by the extent and type of Silva’s omissions and misstatements, he
claimed Silva, as a law enforcement officer, could not be held liable for his
acts.
A few weeks after Larson rescinded
Mary’s right to take Silva to trial, Larson received the endorsement of
Riverside County law enforcement leaders and was given a permanent appointment
to the federal bench by President Bush.
Mary’s case demonstrates how
officials prevented justice regarding Terese’s murder, how the Blue Code of
Silence covered up law enforcement officials’ negligence and incompetence, and
how the “good ole’ boy” network at the county, state, and federal levels
protected Silva from liability for his criminal behavior. Go to
www.murdermislabledsuicide.com for the full details.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Susan Botts, Board Member
Wings of Justice
After
witnessing the murder of their oldest son, Dag, in June 2005, Susan and
her family were in a state of shock and horror. Compounding this, they later
realized that, in the absence of any viable investigation and witness
statements, the county Sheriff had declared Dag’s death an “accident.”
Contacting the California Department of Justice, Susan and family were advised
to file a complaint with the local Sheriff. Months after Dag’s death, the Drug
Task Force Commander conducted an investigation, but neglected to include
accurate statements from the witnesses and included statements from
non-witnesses concerning events they did not personally witness. The officer
also inferred in his report that the accused was not on probation at the time he
killed Dag, despite admissions by the accused and his family and verifiable
external evidence that he was, in fact, on probation at the time for another
violent crime. The officer declined to turn Dag’s case over to the District
Attorney’s office for prosecution based on his perception of “inconsistencies.”
Upon
contacting the California Department of Justice again, Susan and family were
advised to ask the Sheriff’s Department to reexamine the case. The department
declined this request, by way of non-response. The California Department of
Justice then responded that they would not intervene in the case, unless all
local resources for recourse had been exhausted, with complaints filed with the
Sheriff, the District Attorney, the Grand Jury, and any available citizen review
board.
The
Sheriff finally responded in January of 2006 that he had conducted an
investigation, found their complaints to be unfounded (unjustified) and stated
that the accused had not been a contributing factor in Dag’s death.
Unfortunately, and contrary to state and federal policies and procedures,
neither the Sheriff, nor any member of his department, nor any other government
agency or representative, contacted or took statements from any of the witnesses
or complainants before or during this internal investigation. Thus, the Sheriff
failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the matter before arriving at
his conclusions.
Rather
than acknowledge and correct errors, the Sheriff chose, instead, to validate his
officers' conduct, at the expense of justice and the safety of the community.
Susan and family filed complaints with the county Grand Jury, but received no
response until the spring of 2007. The Grand Jury responded that, because the
Sheriff had already investigated and there was no finding of malice, the Grand
Jury would not investigate further. However, the Sheriff Department’s
investigation and internal investigation were the subject of the complaints.
Thus, the Grand Jury did not respond to the actual substance of the complaints.
Susan
and family also filed complaints with the District Attorney’s office, but
received no response, again, until the spring of 2007. The District Attorney
stated that he had not received a homicide report from the Sheriff’s Department
and, thus, had nothing to investigate. The District Attorney invited them to
contact the Department of Justice again. Because the mother of the person who
killed Dag worked in the Victim Witness Division of the District Attorney’s
office, concerns about a conflict of interest at both the DA and Sheriff
Department were unshakable.
Each
agency and official charged with, and each mechanism intended for, the
prevention of these types of injustice and misconduct failed.
The Del
Norte County District Attorney’s office has since come under scrutiny for
allegedly leaking information to the primary suspect in the hit and run murder of
another teen in 2006, unlawful automatic weapon sales across state lines,
unlawfully dropping felony charges in a crime against an elderly couple, receipt
and misappropriation of funds and abnormally large “investigative fees,”
unethical attempts to dismiss criminal charges against DA employees,
over-billing the State of California, and misappropriation and theft of
evidence, among other things. In essence, this District Attorney’s office has
significant misconduct issues that have served to obstruct, rather than uphold,
justice on a wholesale level, while the State of California looks on.
Because
of her experiences, Susan is active in efforts to improve law enforcement
accountability, civil and human rights, and promotes the implementation of a
statewide law enforcement oversight agency as the primary responder
investigating complaints about county agencies and officers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Go to main menu / top of page

Darla Downs, former Probation
Officer,
Santa Barbara County, California
Mike Madigan,
California Licensed Private Investigator, Founding President of Litigation
Archives, Inc. and Editor of The Twisted Badge (
www.twistedbadge.com
)
Mike Roberts,
California Licensed Private Investigator, former Riverside County,
CA Sheriff Detective
www.robertsinvestigations.com
Gary Wenkle Smith, Civil Rights
and Criminal Defense Attorney,
California
www.GaryWenkleSmith4thedefense.com
James Stice,
California Licensed Private Investigator, former Riverside County,
CA Sheriff Officer
Patrick Sullivan, Licensed Private
Investigator, former
Los Angeles Sheriff Detective
www.sullivanpigroup.com
"Living a life that matters doesn't happen by accident. It's not a matter of
circumstance, but of choice. Choose to live a life that matters."
------ Michael Josephson

Go to main menu / top of page

Counseling and Speaker Services
Counseling and
guest speaker services are available from Wings of Justice.
For more
information or to make an appointment, contact:
Mary Stewart
Phone: (951) 698-3133
e-mail: wingsofjustice@yahoo.com

Go to main menu / top of page

On-Line Store
In development at this time.

Go to main menu / top of page

"The world is a dangerous
place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do
nothing."
- Albert Einstein
Donate/Support our Services
Please contact
Wings of Justice concerning donations, support, and participation.

Go to main menu / top of page

Search

Go to main menu / top of page

Contact Us
Phone:
(951) 698-3133
e-mail: wingsofjustice@yahoo.com
Please let us know if you need
emergency support. If you get our message service, we will attempt to return
your call within twenty-four hours. If you do not indicate you are in crisis,
we will respond to your call within one week.
You may alternately fill out
our form below send via email or postal mail and we will get back to you:
First Name
________________________________________
Last Name
_________________________________________
Street Address
______________________________________________
City
_______________________________________________________
State
__________________________________________________
Zip ______________________
Telephone ___________________
FAX _______________________
E-mail _____________________________
Questions and Comments

Go to main menu / top of page
